Passwort ändern
Falls du dein Passwort vergessen hast, kannst du deinen Benutzernamen unten eintragen. Es wird dir dann eine E-Mail mit einem Link zum Erstellen eines neuen Passworts zugesandt werden.
Abbrechen
Link zum Zurücksetzen gesendet
Wenn die E-Mail auf unserer Seite registriert ist, wirst du eine E-Mail mit Anweisungen bekommen, wie du dein Passwort zurücksetzten kannst. Link zum Zurücksetzen des Passwortes wurde gesendet an:
Prüfe deine E-Mail und gib den Bestätigungscode ein:
Siehst du die E-Mail nicht?
  • Bestätigungs-Link Erneut senden
  • Neu starten
Schließen
Wenn du irgendwelche Fragen hast, bitte kontaktiere den Kundenservice
Geile Transen treffen

Filtering Penis  

community 38W   
9121 Beiträge
11.1.2012 10:48 Uhr
Filtering Penis

We want to give women the ability to look at the site without it being a big wall of cock shots. The way we would do this is by adding a female friendly content filter. Then you'd have 3 options for viewing the site:

1) Off (all content is shown)
2) Female friendly (no close up penis shot)
3) On (only PG contents go)

My question to you is would it be ok if we just filtered out the close up cock-shots. The disembodied hand holding his junk with a dab of cum on the tip cock-shots. You'd still see penis and torso, penis and pussy, penis and leg. Sometimes you won't agree with us either.



rm_FXSBOB3 48M
4437 Beiträge
11.1.2012 12:41 Uhr

.

What about a filter for stolen pics?




Transen Kontakte
Parody Of a
Real
Sex Site


rm_NassyFox 61W
37014 Beiträge
11.1.2012 14:35 Uhr

I do think that having a page full of cocks when I sign on is a bit much, but I simply ignore them all. I don't think that is what the men had in mind, but if they knew that's what a lot of us women do, they might change their main pic.

Additionally, can you give some thought to filtering the gaping gyno shots too please?


glidecc 49M  
1224 Beiträge
11.1.2012 14:55 Uhr

This would be handy for the guys browsing groups and blogs as well. I'd rather read a post that doesn't have a schlong close-up next to it.


Spirit6669 58M
2234 Beiträge
11.1.2012 18:10 Uhr

    Zitierend rm_NassyFox:
    I do think that having a page full of cocks when I sign on is a bit much, but I simply ignore them all. I don't think that is what the men had in mind, but if they knew that's what a lot of us women do, they might change their main pic.

    Additionally, can you give some thought to filtering the gaping gyno shots too please?
I agree, please consider gaping gyno shots, and those with all manner of objects inserted. Distasteful to many people I believe and makes the site look very crude.

Also what about blogs/groups etc where we guys are also see close ups of cocks ? It's not just some of the girls who don't really want to see it you know.

Not a biggie to me personally, but if you're going to filter why not offer the buttons to filter close ups to males and females along the same guidelines for catergories. There's also couples and people looking for same sex to consider so why not make it universal ?

Spirit6669
BLOG : Spirit6669 .. 21st Century Zen


BrownEyedBBW 55W  
8831 Beiträge
11.1.2012 18:42 Uhr

Thank you for this. It'd be great to not face a barrage of cock shots. I'm not a fan of the disembodied shots but I can live with it if the close ups can be screened out. You know what else I'd like to see? Unless it's a couples profile, I don't need to see some getting a BJ or having sex with another woman.

If you can screen those out you will be my hero, lol.

Why don't I use the PG filter? Because in addition to the closeup cock shots it also screened out pictures I would find sexy but not too explicit.


PurplePeach72 51W
9194 Beiträge
11.1.2012 20:24 Uhr

I think this is a great idea but also agree that the close up pussy pics should be filtered as well. I don't mind a cock or pussy in the shot with more of the body. That's a great way to see more of the person but up close genital shots are not attractive no matter how attractive the person may be. I'm bi but I don't want to see either up that close.
Thanks for all the improvements of late. Keep up the good work.
Kisses,
LeeAnn


Kisses,
LA


FullOn4U 58M
20399 Beiträge
12.1.2012 5:27 Uhr

How about fixing the numerous bugs before you go about adding features?

By the way, I'd say that they two middle examples of "acceptable photos" are just as bad as the unacceptable ones - they are also disassociated penises, the presence of a woman does not make them any better (not even if she's licking his cock).

And while you're assessing each and every photo (yes, the "gaping gashes" too), why not do a quick check to see if they have been stolen off the net?


bigfitnready 49M
51 Beiträge
12.1.2012 6:27 Uhr

    Zitierend  :

1) I agree with M4rkie.

The vast majority of 'disembodied bits' are just as distasteful when they are female as when they are male.

I find it ironic that some females complain about penis shots but feel comfortable posting badly-shot close-ups of sagging mammaries.

Of course there are some very attractive explicit photos on this site, but the vast majority of the close-ups / cropped photos are just nasty.

2) I also agree with FXSBOB3 and FullOn4U.
While you are considering 'grading' the photos you should also check them with "TinEye" (or similar) to detect both downloads and copies from other members profiles.
It should be simple to automatically detect matches within your own database and at very least flag them for review.

This would have a side-effect of reducing the number of fakes which get approved, at least in the short-term, until the bots get updated with new photos.

3) Ref all those BOTs you could at very least insist that all profiles have a valid geographical location a large proportion of the fakes don't even get this right.
If a real person cannot be bothered to enter a real location on their profile then they are obviously not really motivated to use this site correctly.
So there is really no harm insisting that all geographical locations must make sense. However to do this you might also have to fix the geographical database you use (for example to put "Ashford, Kent, UK" in Kent, UK and not in Derbyshire, UK).

4) You could require all new UK profiles to send you a photo of the banner of their local free newspaper showing their geographical location. Every area in the UK has some kind of free paper delivered (whether it is wanted or not) so no-one can say that they cannot do this. Of course the 'bot' profiles will fing this difficult.

Note that many of the fakes are most probably foreign sweatshop workers typing in profiles from scripts. You can tell from the kind of "English" they use and the typing errors they make. The scripts are always the same, but the typing / cut-and-pasting varies from fake to fake.

5) You should easily be able to auto-detect and filter most of the worst fakes simply by recognising the same cut-and-paste text being used repeatedly. At very least you could refer these for review before they appear online.

None of this is exactly rocket science but you seem really to be either desperately badly organised or just plain uninterested.

From the UK perspective I think you've already lost the battle (maybe you were too busy wasting effort on your pointless recent style makeover - style makes no differnce if you don't have any real members).


needluv694me 77M  
570 Beiträge
12.1.2012 6:34 Uhr

Seems to ME (relative to the pussy shots) there's ALREADY a "content filter" for that.
.
I don't have a problem with "pussy shots"...I just ignore the ones I don't like. I'm not sure it's the best introduction for a woman looking for a relationship, but that's a different thing altogether.
.
I understand that there are those who are not thrilled with the "gyno" shots, but as I said, there's ALREADY a filter for that.
.
That said, it is certainly true that when my girlfriend signs on, she is met with a wall of penises in varying states of turgor (both pre- and post-ejaculation), and I'm sure she'd like some sort of filter that's less extreme than the content filter already in existence.
.


rdy2try4 58W  
3330 Beiträge
12.1.2012 7:58 Uhr

Okay, I DO LIKE this idea. I have seen and heard (even in here) men saying how women complain then post photos the same.. well I DO KNOW that men and women are different creatures. Many women post those photos because we KNOW men will look and it gives them the views necessary to receive free viewing rights. MEN DO on a whole (NOT AL, but MOST like seeing naked women in just about any form they can and many are here specificially because they want raw brutal sex in their faces. They could view 999 boobs and still want to see ONE MORE to make it 1000.. and then another one and so on. WOMEN.. are not the same creature. We KNOW what a penis looks like and we don't normally want to see 1000 of them. It is just a fact of life. There will be those that DO want to look, nothing is just black and white, but to complain that women are posting as they are complaining, come on fellas.. you KNOW there are those that will look and they will get their free rights to view. Women will not return that favor as we really on a whole do NOT care to see that penis.. nothing personal!!

With that said, and knowing it isn't all black and white.. that is why I like this idea. It gives the control to see or not to see to each person. I DO agree that men should have a filter as well as I do note that not every man wants to see the gaping vagina shot.

I DO ALSO agree with a previous few posters... photo 2 and 3 are STILL cock shots even with a person in it. I do not want to see you getting sucked off OR having sex with another woman. I am NOT bi and I personally will not now or ever, and I have honestly never heard it but someone may say it.. NOT gonna say "Ohhhh look at her get it.. I want that too!!" I personally think that many of those photos are used to 'brag' and say they got laid... it is not attractive to me. I would SOOO NOT want to be posted on someone's wall and have often wondered if the women KNOW that their faces are being posted online having sex... seriously.. do these men post and TELL the women they just did it?? I would be horrified if I got to work and found out everyone KNEW because someone SAW a photo that a jacka** posted because he just had to brag he got laid!! Just sayin....


foxeyatfifty 67W

12.1.2012 23:21 Uhr

I DON'T think a filter would be a good idea, as you guys would be the one to judge weather it the cock shot was done in taste full shot with the body, or gross and right in our face!! I saw that was quite original, a cock with sunglasses on!!! he wanted to be in disguise !! It was humorous, but one member did make a good suggestion that men should be "REQUIRED READING FOR MEN ON A.F.F." and they should get it when they sign up! as suggested by another member I think alto of members are getting sick of men of all ages thinking because they have paid and have a cock we are obligated to fuck them!! as they have a cock and show it off!!! so if a email like that was sent when they sign up would be good if they are honestly looking for a good woman or a couple to play with??? or make any contacts????

Have a great horny day LUV


ElizabethBlonde2 48W  
4476 Beiträge
13.1.2012 8:15 Uhr

Filtering is like censorship...If someone doesn't like to view a close up cock or goo box pics..then DONT..simple..

What Gag Reflex? I am A Cum Guzzler!


Spirit6669 58M
2234 Beiträge
13.1.2012 12:29 Uhr

The more I think about this the more questions it raises... Interpretations being a big one, I mean is there a substantial material difference in the nature of the centre two non-filter pics and the three to be filtered in your example ? And the differentials will be even more questionable in pics to be judged subjectively by site staff... How close is too close exactly ? What about a close-up where a cock is mostly buried in a vagina ? From your examples are we to assume that close-up is ok so long as there is a female in view ? A close-up of a cock ejaculating over a face or body would be ok ? What about a cock mostly hidden up an arse ? It's ok for a cock close-up if it incorporates female genitalia too ?

We already see a staggering degree of inconsistency with posting on here, and this new filter will highly subjective and therefore down to the interpretation of the individual reviewer, so there will inevitably a flood of member queries and complaints as to what is and is not filtered and requests for re-review thus further streching staff resouces.

Will there be a knock-on effect on photo post approval times across the board (including on blogs/groups etc) as a result of this additional workload on the photo reviewers ?

Does the filtering of only cocks and not other close-ups (of vaginal/anal penetration for example) eliminate what is undesireable to view for the members who will use the filter ?

Why do you assume that men do not warrant a similar filter for gaping gashes on profiles and the cocks they see in blogs/groups etc ?

I'm not arguing against it, personally I'm de-sensitised after many years of membership. But I do think as it stands it is discriminatory against male members. I think it is rife with ambiguity of interpretation resulting in exacerbating the already high level of inconsistency on here. I think it will attract a lot of complaints/queries. I don't think it eliminates all that is undesireable to the females who will use it. And I question the potential for detrimental knock-on effects of the additional workload on reviewers in other areas of post approval.

Spirit6669
BLOG : Spirit6669 .. 21st Century Zen


rdy2try4 58W  
3330 Beiträge
14.1.2012 9:44 Uhr

I think you folks are missing the point.. The SITE is not going to block your cock shot..they are going to give the OPTION to people to not see if it THEY don't want to. NO ONE is being forced into sensorship. If I don't want to watch a tv show, I do NOT get rid of my tv, I change the channel. That is not sensorship. If "I" choose to not see cock shots or men choose to not see gaping vaginas "THEY" make the choice to 'turn off' those and look at the pics they want to see.

I think this is a wonderful idea as I, as many have stated, do NOT want to get up and be faced with closeups of men's penis' so close that I could see their bladder through the hole!!! Telling me to just leave the site is ridiculous, and no one says that the current 'pg' filter is sensorship.. so just having one that the person viewing can say 'not those' is no different.

I LOVE THE IDEA!!! I have noticed that men would like one as well... I AGREE.


rdy2try4 58W  
3330 Beiträge
14.1.2012 10:04 Uhr

    Zitierend  :

To me, those are NOT all the same. The full body where you see his neck (or part of) and his legs.. is NOT a shot so close I can see his bladder down the hole.

This will not be an exact science, it never is. Even the PG filter does not do all or fix everything. But if you were a woman and you woke up to the 'wall of cock' as we are talking about with nothing but disembodied penis' and no other body part showing it is redundant and does become a turn off.

We were told by Community that they are, as with this posting, trying to define what members consider a 'cock shot' in general guidelines for the filter. That is what this blog is for, member input to help make that definition. Going to this is sensorship is just misleading as no one is being forced to do anything.


rm_NassyFox 61W
37014 Beiträge
14.1.2012 10:18 Uhr

    Zitierend  :

That is the point!

The site will continue to allow all the same pics that they currently show, but they are trying to design a filter, based on member complaints, for the members to use OR NOT USE. No one is forced to use this new filter if they don't want to and they aren't going to remove any up close cock/pussy so people can see those all they want, OR NOT by use of a secondary filter.

This comment is meant to address the concern that several members here have brought up and not an attack on you, alsohere. I took the opportunity to address it via quoting you since your comment was very specific and to the point of much of the confusion.

I hope further comments can stay on topic.

This is not a censorship issue.

This is not a sexist issue.

This is designing an optional filter with member input issue.

I also agree that providing a gender neutral tag for the function would be better.


nutmegsrevenge 43W

14.1.2012 22:44 Uhr

I personally LOVE seeing close up cock shots. We are on a site that is explicit in nature.

Perhaps I'm in the minority. I just happened to post this blog about how much I like cock shots... Show me your COCK and Koffla directed me to this post.

I'm surprised with the amount of people who are really offended by it. Maybe it's because I am one of those people with a "gyno shot" that I'm not offended. At least it's not my profile pic, but it's there.

Always and in All Ways,

Nutmeg


itsallfantasy 57W  
1150 Beiträge
15.1.2012 13:35 Uhr

    Zitierend  :

I must be missing something.. NO ONE said they can't stand the site of a penis. I see many people saying they don't want JUST A PENIS shoved at them with no body no nothing. I have seen men saying they don't want closeups of a vagina so close that all they can see is the cervix. Where did 'can't stand the site of a penis' come in here????

Does this mean that the MEN that didn't want to see gaping vaginas 'don't want to see vaginas'??? LOL I am betting you are not going to attack the men that way. There are a few even in this thread that don't want to see the gyno shots and you are NOT going to tell them if they don't like it stop whining and leave the site either.

YES, it is an adult site. YES, it is sex based. I am just not seeing how because some want and some don't that being on a sex site or sex based means you MUST see giant balls and holes and no other body part as if that is all you need to meet someone. I am here for EXHIBITIONISM ONLY. Yes, that IS a sex based thing. I don't have to meet or anything. Even I get tired of the same Lamo emails with disembodied penis' and nothing else.

I LOVE a full body shot, I love to see if you are fat or skinny. I can see how that penis is in relation to the WHOLE body!! Not just some trick shot to make it look like a gargantuan unbelievable unit. I think having a filter to be able to take the disembodied penis' out for ME, and the women that WANT to see just that can look at what THEY want just the same is a GREAT IDEA! Same for the men, give them the ability to view what they want and weed out the rest.

Everyone has likes and dislikes, and we should ALL have the right to control what we want to see and not see. Yelling we are church goers or we should leave and quit whining because it is a sex site, or go to we don't want to view 'any' penis at all, come on folks. Sex has many different forms and filters and things to help us each achieve what each person wants to achieve is the point here I thought. No one should be told to leave or insulted as they have a softer view of sex than another, or harder view of sex than eharmny. Filters are a great idea for both sexes.


itsallfantasy 57W  
1150 Beiträge
15.1.2012 13:42 Uhr

    Zitierend Spirit6669:
    I agree, please consider gaping gyno shots, and those with all manner of objects inserted. Distasteful to many people I believe and makes the site look very crude.

    Also what about blogs/groups etc where we guys are also see close ups of cocks ? It's not just some of the girls who don't really want to see it you know.

    Not a biggie to me personally, but if you're going to filter why not offer the buttons to filter close ups to males and females along the same guidelines for catergories. There's also couples and people looking for same sex to consider so why not make it universal ?
I AGREE with this totally!!! And I am betting he doesn't get told any of the previous.

GOOD POST!!


anastasia666 45W
2231 Beiträge
16.1.2012 3:01 Uhr

    Zitierend rm_NassyFox:
    That is the point!

    The site will continue to allow all the same pics that they currently show, but they are trying to design a filter, based on member complaints, for the members to use OR NOT USE. No one is forced to use this new filter if they don't want to and they aren't going to remove any up close cock/pussy so people can see those all they want, OR NOT by use of a secondary filter.

    This comment is meant to address the concern that several members here have brought up and not an attack on you, alsohere. I took the opportunity to address it via quoting you since your comment was very specific and to the point of much of the confusion.

    I hope further comments can stay on topic.

    This is not a censorship issue.

    This is not a sexist issue.

    This is designing an optional filter with member input issue.

    I also agree that providing a gender neutral tag for the function would be better.
Nassy,

Thanks..I agree..I do not see this as any kind of censorship issue or sexist.I think there should be a filter for anyone to use to block whatever they do not want to view/see or read..(Couples, men and women..all should have the same filter )

Please vote and stay within the topic of this thread so Ryan and the company can get a good idea of what members want to see happen and so we can all help in making the site a better place to be and visit.

Hugs,

Ana6



I done made the devil a deal
He made me pretty
He made me smart


thenewcougar1 61W
199 Beiträge
16.1.2012 20:14 Uhr

I don't care if someone has a cock shot or not. It's my perogrative if I want to look or not. We're all adults here so why change it. There is already a content filter, I think that is good enough as it.


rm_NassyFox 61W
37014 Beiträge
18.1.2012 15:11 Uhr

People, if they implement this feature, it will be an OPTION for members to use

or NOT use.

If you want to see all the cock shots, then simply don't use the filter.

If you want to continue using the full photo filter, then use that. If you want to limit the types of photos you see to a softer core, then use the filter they are trying to design, based on members desires.

They will not stop cock shots from being posted or viewed. They will be there in full if that's what you want.

Based on the number of complaints from members, they are simply adding another filter for those who don't want to see them. It will not affect anyone else if someone uses the newer filter.

GET IT NOW?????


MsCosset 47W

18.1.2012 15:50 Uhr

I think this is a great idea. It is a turn-off to be greeted by a penis instead of a man. I don't mind some cock shots however, cocks that are inside another woman or ejaculating are just disgusting. I really have no desire to be the one to raise my hand and say OH I WANT TO BE NEXT... it just makes the man look unsafe and shows his risky behavior. In the same breath, even though I am bi, I dislike upclose shots of a woman's genitalia, therefore, that should also be included in the filter. I know many men prefer sensual/sexy photos to upclose genitalia shots. This site feels more like men think they are going to get laid just because they send women an email... free prostitution. The hate mail I get because I refuse to take my clothes off is alarming.

Another issue: FIX THE BAN/IGNORE in chat - when I ban someone on Chat - They should not be able to see what I am posting. It really defeats the purpose if you block someone because they are harassing you and they can still see what you are saying then continue to stalk and harass you. It is frustrating for other chatters, as well.

I welcome this opportunity of pricking the bloated bladder of lies with the poniard of truth


SadieMaeGlutz 54W
16 Beiträge
19.1.2012 7:03 Uhr

Okay.... I personally woke up to find the most DISGUSTING PHOTO in my inbox. If I had THIS filter it would not have been there. It was so freaking close and absolutely SO FREAKING HAIRY I though a gorilla must have been on this site. I almost barfed.

To send out and have freaking close ups of a cock so large you can see the darned hair follicles (as well as that many hairs) is absolutely enough to make me PUKE!!!

Sorry, I DO NOT like to see THAT at all at ANY time. A full body shot would most definitely been a better view. GIVE ME THE FILTER!!

If you want to see them ... then see them. If I don't want to see them.. let me block them to make MY day here more enjoyable for ME!!! I am not here to make anyone else happy, that is for sure.


rm_a704guy 48M
55 Beiträge
21.1.2012 12:53 Uhr

I've heard woman asking for something like this for a long time, so I can (sort of) see it from their prospective. On the other hand, this IS an adult site & I'd rather Transen Kontakte / Various fix the broken items that have been reported over & over & over again on "Transen Kontakte is Listening" (NOT!!)

What I want is a FAT FOLKS & OLD FOLKS filter. Yeah, I'm slim and almost middle aged, so fat & old are not "things" I want to look at. But, hey if we're going to start making filters, let's give these options to everyone.

BTW... is it use me or do the pictures on the man page not auto-update anymore. (Have to click refresh manually.) Using Firefox, latest version over here. Maybe try to fix that before you break something else????


Massage_Man_00 41M
18009 Beiträge
29.1.2012 14:29 Uhr




I still find it funny hat my picture is filtered

Even funnier to see now how many people have followed in my footsteps (so to speak)


Much Love, Respect and Great Adventures to Follow





Come Inside [blog massageman00]

Want a Bob? The Giveaway

Got a burning question? Ask Bob


Erin599 64T

1.2.2012 3:39 Uhr

Any filter choice is good. I won't filter penises myself but I would love to filter out facial comeshots ^_*


rm_a704guy 48M
55 Beiträge
2.2.2012 10:14 Uhr

There you go buddy. That right there is what I want to be able to filter out. Where's MY ('effing) filter?? It's ironic to me that you folks are busy finding ways to filter out penis instead of focusing on a recurrent problem of TOO MANY BLATANTLY OBVIOUS FAKES & spammers on here. (That would be such a better use of your time & resources, I promise.)

Finally, I'll point out that this IS an adult site (an adult SEX & SWINGERS site,) or at least that is what it WAS when I signed up. If people don't want to see "dick pics' and it's so overwhelming and offensive to them, they can just go join up with a site that doesn't allow those pictures period. Passion.com's Cristian Friendfinder may be a good starting place. (Gimme a 'effing break y'all.)


Centaur_UK 46M
1770 Beiträge
18.2.2012 18:31 Uhr

Why don't you give us guys a filter for all the fake/scam profiles on here?

and.............WARNING for Porn viewers

Please visit my blog here Centaur_UK


nd2hvfun 65W  
10021 Beiträge
9.4.2012 22:42 Uhr

It's a sex site...not the E site...i dont mind cocks, if you filter those filter the pussies, what i dont want to see is a man with a hood ornament at the end of his cock ie lips a pussy an ass...i have been on here 10 years with this profile 7-8 and another 2 years...lower your darn prices i used to pay $33 for 3 months silver and do away with the catering to standard

je ne regrette rien


stevenjosepht 78M
3726 Beiträge
18.6.2012 16:25 Uhr

Personally, I don't like filtering anything. If someone is dumb enough to post an ugly, unattractive photo of their genitalia, then they are dumb enough to post an ugly, unattractive photo of their genitalia.

The ones you showed as to be filtered were not the most un-attractive I've see.

Photography is an art form that depends on the skill of the photographer and the attractiveness of the subject. The ability to match both skills for an exquisite shot is the challange that creates the art.

And my own personal feeling: many photos on Transen Kontakte rival that of Helmut Newton. So like I say, I'm not in favor of any sort of filter.


handsomeboy2776 47M

8.8.2012 3:35 Uhr

I'm so glad you guys are making some changes on the site in order to improve it.

I do have a suggestion. I'm a guy living in Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia. Not many women in my city know about this site and the town has a population of almost three million people.

I wonder if you guys can ad in the different website networks. All the people in my town use facebook and hotmail messenger so maybe there is a good chance to ad there.

I'm a gold member and very active member but I think it isn't worthy if there are just a few female members in my area.

P.S. I apologize for the language mistakes. I'm not a native English speaker. I speak Spanish as my first language and English as my second one.


Werden Sie Mitglied, um in diesem Blog Kommentare schreiben zu können.